Tuesday, August 13, 2013

By Hamma Mirwaisi and Alison Buckley

Human evolution is very slow. It took one hundred and thirteen generations from the time Cyrus the Great of the Median (ancient Kurdish) Empire established a constitution granting human rights under the rule of just laws until the American Constitution, based on the same precepts, was formulated. Other nations of the ancient Middle East went to Cyrus the Great asking him to assume rule over their countries because of his human rights policies.

Although the United States has itself become strong by implementing them, few developing or war torn nations expect them to be realised in US foreign policy interventions. Its declining popularity has been further tarnished by its support for dictators, corrupt leaders and criminals in countries that have been disadvantaged by years of wars for control of resources and the populations through the imposition of religious ideologies by monolithic powers.

These associations are not only detrimental to the US now and in the long run, they oppose everything the US professes to stand for. President Obama may be excused for his youth and inexperience in regard to America’s future, but his more senior former Secretary of State Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton also failed to engage with opportunities to secure US interests in contentious regions of the world such as the Middle East, whose stability is a global issue.

With the blessing of Israel, Saudi Arabia and the knowledge of the US Government, the Prime Minister of Turkey and the President of Kurdistan closed the border on Kurdish people in Syria and supplied arms to al-Qaida affiliated organization, Al-Nusra Front or Jabhat al-Nusra and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syrian terrorist organizations to kill civilian Kurds. You can find videos in YouTube by Al-Nusra Front and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria terrorist organization burning Kurds alive and butchering Kurds or shooting them in the head to show the world how they kill non- believers of Islam. What else state department want to see from them?

Listen learn, the US Government helped Osama bin Laden to fight Russian in Afghanistan but we all know, what al-Qaida of Osama bin Laden did to America. Why Obama administration are helping such groups in Syrian war?

The US Governments are dealing with Communist China. Let assume that PKK are similar to China, why they are not dealing with them?

For those who do not understand “Kurdistan”, Kurdistan is divided by four countries namely Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Syria. In Turkey PKK is fighting for liberation of Kurdistan, in Iran PJAK is fighting for liberation of Kurdistan, in Iraq KDSP is fighting for liberation of Kurdistan and in Syria PYD is fighting for liberation of Kurdistan. These four organizations are united under KCK (Kurdistan Parliament) command.

KCK are in control of commerce gateway to Europe for over 500 million people from Turkey to Pakistan and from Kurdistan to former countries of Soviet Union. These regions are undeveloped land with every kind of natural resources. It is much more productive for the US and EU interest than China. Majority of Kurdish people are supporting KCK now, the land of Kurdistan are the source of water in Iran, Iraq and Syria, the land is very rich with Oil and gas too. Massoud Barzani is only in control of one Kurdish tribe. His father become famous among Kurds because of Sheikh Abdul-Salam Barzani’s execution by Ottoman Turkish Empire, today grandson of Sheikh Abdul-Salam Barzani is standing up against Massoud Barzani’s betrayal of Kurdish people.

In conclusion the interest of the US are best served to deal with people’s organization. KCK and Kurdish leader are expecting supper power like the US to be peacemaker instead of supporter of terrorist organization.

There was “Unconfirmed reports have emerged detailing a new massacre in which 450 Kurds - including 120 children - were allegedly slaughtered by al-Qaeda-linked rebels fighting against the Syrian government. The report has sparked international concern”.
“Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has called on the UN Security Council to “unambiguously” censure the mass killing of Syrian Kurds by foreign-backed radical militants fighting the Damascus government”. But when questioned by RT, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the US “would always be concerned with any reports of attacks on civilians or any others of this kind” but otherwise had little to add.
“I’ll have to look more closely into that specific report,” she said at the Wednesday briefing. “You are probably very familiar with how we view al-Nusra and we’ve designated them as a terrorist organization. We have taken many steps to ensure to our best ability that aid and assistance of all kinds is going to the moderate components of the opposition – and that’s the message that we have conveyed publically and privately. But we certainly are aware of the continuance of the extremist elements.”

Why the US secretary of state is not informed about the Kurdish people and their leadership importance in the Syrian war, It is understandable that President is without info about the region and Vice President Joe bidden has been advised by supporter of Barzani and secretary of state suppose to have detail information about who are popular with Kurdish people and who is not so he can advise President to serve the interest of the US people.

Disturbing report alleges killings of 450 Kurds in Syria
Russia demands UN censure of Kurds massacre by Syria militants

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Hamma Mirwaisi On Arab Oppression Of The Kurds

By Hamma Mirwaisi and Alison Buckley
Ever since the Islamic Arab Army conquered the land of Kurdistan in Syria and Iraq during the eras of the Sassanid and Roman Empires almost 1400 years ago, Kurdistan has been without peace to our time.
The Kurdish people were the first victims of Arab imperialism, ostensibly inflicted as Islamic teachings.
The Islamic Arab Army killed millions of Kurds, and took millions of Kurdish women to be sold as sex slaves in Medina, the Saudi Arabian capital of the second Islamic Khilafah Umar Ibn Khattab of the Arab Islamic Empire. No one should wonder today why the Kurdish women in Syria are fighting the Islamic members of Al-Nusra and the Al-Qaeda affiliated Islamic State of Iraq. They simply do not want to be sex slaves again.  
Arabs are still using the Islamic religion to take other nations' land; since invading from Africa with the Egyptian army they have progressively assumed more Kurdish land, destroying more of its people and consuming more of its resources. Iraq and Syria are both victims of Islamic Arab aggressive expansionism in the name of religion.
The Arab Islamic Army then created religious leaders called Sheiks, who originally came from the Kurds; and the Sayyieds, who were originally Arabs. Now the Kurdish people are divided between four power groups: Sayyieds, Sheiks, tribal leaders and Kurds. In an attempt to extinguish their hopes and desire for autonomy, the first three factions' exploitative divide and rule tactics have been used against the Kurdish people as a means of further weakening, controlling and subjecting them.
They were imposed on an already fragmented society. From the collapse of the Median (ancient Kurdish) Empire around 500BCE until 1800 CE, Persians, Arabs and Turks had cunningly used tribal leaders to sell out Kurds in the same way. The Kurdish People choice to defect to religious leaders namely Sayyieds and Sheiks has lasted till our time.
Any moderately curious observer can easily find out that the majority of the Kurdistan Regional Governments' (KRG) officials now come from the Sayyied, Sheik and tribal leaders' ruling class.
Today Kamal Said (Sayyied) Qadir is fighting Sheik Massoud Barzani for leadership of the Kurds; yesterday Sheik Jalal Talabani was fighting Sheik Mullah Mustafa Barzani for the top Kurdish leadership position.
The Kurdish people may well ask why, as their records and ideologies indicate a uniform failure to provide material and social benefits, and acceptable solutions to issues around human rights and democracy for Kurdistan. The answer implies the perpetuation of their personal, political, economic, religious and social empires.
Thus the political battle for the control of Kurdistan now resembles the centuries' old war between the Persians, Turks and Arabs to rule the Kurdish people.
The glaring question is when will the Kurdish people wake up and say "no' to the occupiers and impose their own solution on them? Since both the black and the white dogs of Kurdish politics tend to ravenously consume the Kurdish people, the only option is for Kurds to arm themselves against the hungry packs of Persians, Arabs and Turks, sending a clear and forceful message that they want to freely elect Kurds to serve them, not the predatory Sheiks, Sayyieds and tribal leaders and their agents.
Listen you hunters of Kurdish humanity, this is the message we howl at your incestuous cronies from the tops of the Kandil Mountains: we are Kurds; we want to be free, electing one of us to serve us. We are more than tired of being abused by you and your agents, but we will exhaust you in the war for self-determination.
Hamma Mirwaisi and Alison Buckley are authors of the historical novels Vashti Queen of the Ancient Medes (Kurds) and Esther Mystery Queen of the Medes (Kurds). They are working to revive the ancient "Airyanem Civilization" record in this series of (more...)

Sunday, March 3, 2013

By Hamma Mirwaisi and Alison Buckley

Note: To examine the multiple causes of conflicts in the Middle East and establish foundational knowledge of the Airyanem Civilization, we have already published the novel Vashti, Queen of the Ancient Medes. The first in a series providing background information about the real historical significance of characters such as the famous Queen Esther (Esteraka) of the Medes, Vashti’s life story is inextricably linked with a truly unique account in the book Esther, Mystery Queen of the Medes, detailing the consequences of the deportation of a young Jewish captive of the Babylonian Empire with her family to Susa, the winter capital of the ancient Median Empire. From amongst many beautiful girls, King of Kings Astyages (Ahasuerus) of the Medes chose her to be his Queen. Reflecting some of the root causes of today's Middle Eastern dilemmas, this ancient tale of personal power ploys, harems, conspiracies and inter-imperial power machinations provides rare insights into an almost forgotten but rich continuous culture paralleling the most influential of past and present civilisations. 


Note: in Year 1400 BCE there was only a tiny African foothold in Canaan and Amurru as Egyptian colonies in Aryan lands.

The map of the Middle East above shows the original scope of the Aryan lands centered on the holdings of the Aryan Mittani Empire in orange and the Aryan Kassite Empire in green all the way to the yellow border. Africans (now is called Arabs) occupied the yellow land only by 1400 BCE, the rest of the land from India to Europe belonged to the Aryan people.

The Egyptian Army invaded the Airyanəm Vaējah/Eran-vej (my Aryan land or expanse of the Aryans) around 5000 BCE; this Egyptian expedition preceded settlers such as the Phoenicians in approximately 4000 BCE, the Akkadians (who conquered the Elam Aryan Empire in 2300 BCE and established the Akkadian Empire), and the Greeks who took over the Mediterranean Islands and others around 1400 BCE.

Airyanəm Vaējah is one of the "mythical homelands" of the early Aryans and a reference in the Zoroastrian Avesta (Vendidad, Farg. 1) to one of Ahura Mazda's ‘sixteen perfect lands.’

The Arab, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Armenian, Greek, Phoenician and Georgian sectors of the Egyptian army were originally from Africa. But after they conquered the Aryan land, in time these peoples separated from the Egyptians and established many empires in the Middle East. The final one was the Islamic Arab Empire. Today it controls a large part of Aryan land and is now trying to change the name of the Persian Gulf to the ‘Arabian Gulf’.

Interestingly the occupants of the heavily contested land of Israel have claimed for 3800 years that they are part of the African people, despite the Africans’ refusal to accept them because of their Aryan blood. In recent years the Jewish people’s DNA has shown their genetic closeness to the Aryan Kurds and no relationship to the Africans. The Jews’ Hurrian blood reveals they came from the lands north of the Aryan Mitanni tribes. These differences probably still feed into the conflicts.

While the Arab-Israeli conflict features largely in Middle Eastern politics little is known about the Arab-Persian (Aryan) conflict. The recently released introductory book of the ‘Airyanem Civilization’ series of novels informs readers about the origins of this too frequently dismissed but very active struggle, which simmers  behind the other prolonged Middle Eastern antagonisms deemed more noteworthy and more newsworthy.

Aims of Today’s Iran

The Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) established by Sayyed Shi’a Arabs in 1979, is the continuation of 1400 hundred year old Arab Imperialist occupation forces. Iran is ruled by Shi’a Sayyed Arabs who are descendants of the Prophet Mohammad. After conquering the indigenous Aryan people of Iran and Iraq (the forbears of the ancient Medes and Persians), they have set out to exterminate them over the centuries and continue their campaign to the present.

The wealth of Iran is currently being used by the Sayyed ruler of Iran to build the Islamic Shi’a bomb to first attack the Arab Islamic Sunnis, the next target being the Aryan people of the Middle East.

Arabian History

The Prophet Mohammad was born April 26, 570 AD in the city of Mecca, Saudi Arabia and died June 8, 632 AD in the city of Medina, Saudi Arabia. He founded the Islamic religion with the aim of destroying the SassanidAryan Empire (native name Eran Shahr) the last pre-Islamic Persian Empire, lasting from 224 CE to 651 CE, and the Roman Byzantine Aryan Empire. The Arabs’ land had been divided and ruled by both these Empires.

Politically the land of Arabia at the time was divided between two tribal confederations, the Banu Qais, loosely allied with the Roman Byzantine Empire and who were originally powerful in the northern and western part of Arabia, and the Banu Kalb, who had originally come from Yemen, and were loosely allied with the Sassanid Empire.

Imam Jafar al-Sadiq, born in702 AD in the city of Medina in Saudi Arabia, was a descendant of the Prophet Mohammad’s family and started the Islamic Shi’a sect with the goal of conquering the entire Arab world, including the Islamic regions. The opponents of his family’s rule are called Sunni Muslims, who are now in control of the Arab and Islamic worlds.
Iran’s atomic bomb is integral to the perpetuation of the Islamic Shi’a sect’s goals. It will be used first against the Arabs of Saudi Arabia before it is unleashed on Israel.

The new recently published ‘Airyanem Civilization’ series of novels introduces the historical origins of these potentially explosive political relationships.

Aryan Empires

The conflict between the Median Empire and the Greeks of African origin started around 540 BCE; the Sassanid (Persian) Aryan Empire adopted the policies of the Median Empire and the Roman Byzantine Aryan Empire adopted the policies of the Greek Empire. Both Empires fought one another for 400 years. The conflict between the Aryan Empires aided the Arabs of African origin to expand their territories and increase their population growth.

Both Aryan Empires were very weak during the Prophet Mohammad’s time. They did not have time to deal with the Arabs. Mohammad took over Arabia without being noticed by the leaders of both Empires, uniting the Arabs. The rivalries between the Arab tribes of Banu Qais and Banu Kalb were suppressed by Islam but have continued to influence events in the Middle East and North Africa in post-Islamic times.

Further information on the military career and expeditions of the Prophet Muhammad and the beginning of Islam’s armed conflict against its neighbors can easily be accessed online and from various hard copy sources.

Prophet Mohammed’s Political Goals and the Sassanid Aryans

The Arabs successfully used the Islamic religion for the accomplishment of the Prophet Mohammad’s political goals. An Arab Islamic Army conquered the Sassanid Empire in year 633 AD after the battle of al-Qādisiyyah; and the Arabs occupied Ctesiphon, the capital of the Sassanid Empire known today as Baghdad in Iraq. By the year 651 AD the last Sassanid King was dead and the Arab Islamic army had killed, raped or taken millions of Aryan women to be sold in the city of Medina, the capital of the new Islamic Arab Empire, to Arabian and North African merchants or to be used as sex slaves. The entire populations of the conquered lands of the Aryan people, consisting of either Zoroastrians or Christians were forced to convert to Islam.

The Arab Islamic Army’s battle of Tabouk commenced the Arabs’ conquest of the Roman Byzantine Empire in 630 AD, eventually they took the eastern half of today’s Turkey; following the Arabs’ decline the Ottoman Turkish Empire finally extinguished the Roman Byzantine Empire. Ottoman Turks occupied the city of Constantinople (Turkish: İstanbul) in 1453 AD. Only the Serbians of Europe stood in the way of the Ottoman Islamic Turkish Empire army on their way to conquer the rest of the Aryan lands of Europe.

Arab Internal Conflicts

The Arabs successfully defeated the Aryan Empires of the Middle East, but they had internal conflicts over who should rule their empire. Sunni Islamic Arabs come from the opponents of Prophet Mohammad’s family while Shi’a Islamic Arabs leaders, called Sayyed, come directly from the Prophet Mohammad’s family.

Persian and other Aryan tribes hoping for relief from Arab oppression followed Prophet Mohammad’s family under the leadership of General Abu Muslim Khorasani in750 AD.  Khorasani supported the descendants of Abbess, the uncle of Prophet Mohammad. The Aryan forces under General Khorasani’s command defeated the Umayyad Arab Empire’s forces after losing large numbers of Aryan fighters. He then established the Abbasid Arab Empire for Prophet Mohammad’s family members. 

The second King of Abbasid Dynasty Abu Ja'far al-Mansur stabbed General Abu Muslim Khorasani’s back with an Arab dagger and killed him instantly in 755 AD as payback for his services, instead of rewarding him. This duplicity resonates strongly with all the Aryan people to our time, because it established the Abbasid Arab Empire for the descendants of Prophet Mohammad but deprived the Aryans of their freedom and self-rule.

Entrenched Ideological Differences

In contrast at one stage in the contest the Kurds arrested 100,000 Arab soldiers and eventually released them all whereas the Arabs killed every one of their captives. These atrocities like those already committed against women and freedom of conscience and worship set the ideological stage for deliberate total annihilation by the atomic bomb. They are the tragically real and potentially even more disastrous social and political outcomes of the continuous loss of Aryan lands to the Arabs.

In recent history Persian and other Aryan people have not always shown that they have learned from the harsh lessons of the past.  When they helped yet another member of the Mohammed family, Ayatollah Sayyed Khomeini establish one more Arab Empire in Iran they left the Aryan people to suffer under the ruler of Iran until the present.

Monday, February 11, 2013

Thank you Dr. Wippich for your comments.

Please accept the by defining Aryan from the Sanskrit arya (noble) and civilisation as bringing a people under a regular system of laws and education, where societies achieve mixture of poetry and prose in our title. To clarify further we will resume an advanced stage of development and organization.

Replying to your comments we would maintain the following:

When you look at Kurdistan today you see women guerrillas fighting for the two and a half thousand year old rights that Queen Vashti was forced to yield and which their sisters under repressive regimes cannot access.  They are mostly ‘invisible’ amongst the fresh living springs of the mountains to which the Kurdish people have been driven for centuries by the river plains dwellers, whose occupied land they originally owned. Their weapons, although different from the bows, arrows and spears used by Vashti to hunt the bambis of the king’s grounds are just as finely tuned to meet their mark as their civilisation’s female founder.

If Queen Vashti, born into the only known ancient culture that gave women equality, refused her husband’s request then it stands to reason that she must have been asked to do something illegal, or personally defamatory or both. Her husband Ahasuerus (Astyages of the Medes, the forbears of the Kurds) made a decree against her and sent it out by post, indicating a high degree of legal organisation, literacy, transport and communications.

While those Kurdish women not dominated by externally imposed misogyny have the equal rights and status that most women in the West would envy, how can anyone dispute the enviable and viable indicators that these enlightened traditions came from a civilisation? We will henceforth explore the nobility of its qualities.

On the slightly less uplifting topic of stones, there are monuments throughout Kurdistan that add veracity to claims in our books. The tombs of King Cyaxares, Queen Esther and her Prime Minister, Mordecai are freely accessible to visitors and it’s easy to see that they have been copied by the Nabateans of Petra. The ruins of the Medes’ palace citadel described in detail by Herodotus (at least one Greek historian got it right) at Hamadan (formerly the Medes’ capital Ecbatana) are still under excavation. Saddam Hussein was the second ‘Babylonian’ to try to copy the original Hanging Gardens of the great Sar Kalai.

How many more bones are yet to be recovered from this site and that of Godin Tepe in western Iran (should be Aryan) is unknown. But the limited evidence of human remains at Gobekle Tepe in south-eastern Turkey is far surpassed by arrangements, not unlike the younger Stonehenge, of its accredited world’s first temple, consisting of some sixteen foot stones (yes Kurdistan has more) weighing six to ten tons (admittedly only two thirds of the biggest stones in the Great Pyramid, but the Aryan Medes did not take slaves).

These early engineers, mathematicians and astrologers preceded the Medes who helped the Babylonians conquer the ancient Assyrian city of Nineveh by building earthen ramparts against the walls up which they sent the best of their mountain climbers. Then they raided King Ashiburnipal’s huge palace in their red chariots. The Median magi were the only ones with sufficiently accurate knowledge of the stars to pinpoint the arrival of the infant Jesus Christ in distant Judea.

It is a scientific tenet now established by those seeking to legitimise the evolutionary origins of humanity that ‘we are still searching for the missing link.’ We would like to adopt similar archaeological licence in relation to the existence of ancient Aryan bones, that are yet to tell us more of their lives.

But on the matter of DNA origins we can announce that the Jews’ and the Aryans’ are the same, posing even more questions about their centuries old enmity.

Although they have not yet been found empire building was in the bones of Vashti’s husband. His father, historically confirmed as King Cyaxares, established the empire by defeating the Scythian interlopers using the code words ‘Aha’ and ‘Shverosh’ (revolt now). This became the generic title for all Median (not Persian) kings as mis-claimed by some interpreters of the biblical book of Esther.

Evidence for the family placement and role of Vashti has become apparent in the last two centuries when theologians closely studied the prophecies and history in the biblical book of Daniel. It revealed that Astyages, most likely born around 620 BCE, the Ahasuerus husband of Vashti and Esther was also the father of Darius the Mede, (the only other Ahasuerus comes after Darius the Great just beyond 520 BCE) who was sixty two years old in 539 BCE. The most likely mother of Darius is Vashti, Ahasuerus’ first wife. It is plausible that Vashti suffered from her husband’s indulgence in a harem although Hadassah-Esther’s subjection to then non-traditional patriarchal power and subordination is more vividly portrayed.
Your mention of Vashti’s divorce which was anathema in her family and fidelity based culture (more qualities which past and present cultures either relinquished, lost or were deprived of by force or complicit brainwashing), reminds us of the divorce of her descendants from freedom. The faces of some of the contemporary Kurdish grandmothers may be calm, whether their grandchildren fighting in their armies to regain the land of Queen Vashti have survived or not, but their young people are more than disturbed about a future of domination by several foreign nations.

Why this intense sense of identity amongst the Kurds? Where does the indefatigable belief in Kurdistan come from? Even the casual observer could conclude that these sentiments and desires are deeply ingrained in these people whose dress, food, music, poetry, literature, ethnic crafts, jewellery, (what is left of these pre-marauded arts), horse handling skills, social customs and belief in themselves as a nation are mostly unique to these stateless people. Why would they bother to fight four different countries at once if they didn’t come from a definitive culture within the context of a civilisation founded on an ideology of monotheism similar to the Egyptian Queen Nefertiti (who coincidentally was a forbear of Vashti –they were originally of the same Mitanni tribe)?
Certainly Darius the Great, a descendant of King Astyages of Media was competently literate. Hamma Mirwaisi has read and translated the Behistun (Behishtan) cuneiform inscriptions written by King of Kings Darius the Great. This document was originally deciphered by the honorable Professor Roland G. Kent, 1953 See UC Berkeley documents.

The Achaemedian Empire King of Kings Darius the Great left extensive cuneiform inscriptions in the Aryan language (Kurdish people are using the same language today), he said this below:

In Darius, Behishtan (DB), Column 4, number 89 below:

He is saying I used Aryan language in my inscriptions’ writing.

88 m : taumâm : uba(r)tâm : paribarâ : thâtiy : Dârayavaush : xshâyathiya : vashnâ : Au

‘Protect well the family of these men, because they helped me against those separated from my path, praise upon him, Darius, he is king and law givers, by the favor of,’
89 ramazdâha : i(ya)m : dipîmaiy : ty(âm) : adam : akunavam : patisham : ariyâ : âha : utâ : pavast

‘Auramazdâ (God), this is the inscription which I made, among us, mankind, there are those who are not wise, our reward is written, in Aryan language, alert, as known, it is on clay tablets and on parchment it was composed,

The written language in different formats, evidence of organised religion and laws is recorded in stone! For a more comprehensive translation of this magnificent document see Hamma’s site

We want to engage western scholars and readers to examine their own origins. As mentioned above the people from Middle East and Asia share common ancestors with western people but have been fighting one another for over 2500 years.

The western countries are dominated by Greek and Jewish scholars’ versions of history; both were enemies of one another but they have become enemies of the Aryan people for different reasons. Greeks came from Africa and became the enemies of the Medes and the Persians; they tried to change the history of the Aryan people for political reasons, especially after Alexander the Great conquered the land of the Airyanem people. As we have noted this land was rich in natural resources, noble, civilised people and a well organised society. Nothing has changed, including their domination by foreigners.

The Hebrew people came from Hurrian (Aryan settlers) tribes and became enemies of the other Aryan tribes, even to our time. They even changed their own identity unsuccessfully to African in order to distinguish themselves from the hated Aryan tribe of Matine, who conquered the Hurrian land.

Arab Africans and later Mongol Turks occupied the land of the Aryan people, the four groups above (Greek, Jews, Arabs and Turks) allied to despise the Aryan people.

In the same way ancient Roman, and the modern British, French, Russian and American Empires under the influence of Greek and Jewish teaching banded together against the Aryans of the Middle East under the influence of Islamic Arabs who constituted another force in the conflict.

The four groups above divided the Aryan people against one another for over 2500 years. That is why the Airyanem Civilization has been neglected and overlooked by western people.

We are writing a series of books to revive the Airyanem Civilization; please share your views so more people can understand the reasons for the ignorance of this civilization in relation to the better known and publicised civilizations found throughout the world.

Kurdistan has been oppressed for two and half thousand years. Unlike its older politically challenged and financially spent neighbours who have long worked to deprive it of its legitimacy on the world stage, Kurdistan is young, energetic, full of vigour and waiting to be born. When all its parts are finally knit together, it will emerge as predicted in the age old prophecy as the Returned Medes.'

Follow this story from its earliest times by reading the Airyanem Civilisation series by Alison Buckley and Hamma Mirwaisi.


User Profile for Dr.Wippich
Registered:        Dec 14, 2012
Total Posts:       1
Location    NRW Germany
Occupation         medicine, history etc
Biography born 1945 - still living

Dr.Wippich Reply to my post at link below

Posts: 1
Registered: 12/14/12
Re: What is the Airyanem civilization? compared to Egyptian Civilization
Posted: Dec 14, 2012 7:26 AM     in response to: Hamma Mirwaisi
fiction , fantasy , emancipator , romance
Hi, Hamma 

I assume, this was no question of Yours but a poetical statement? - it isn't possible to compare fresh living springs & "green grass of home" with stones, bones & translated ancient "news" from 4 to 6'000 years ago . Queen Vashti - the poor divorced-one of the Purim story located in about 2'400 years ago - has to "live-up" in that (kurdish?) book in modern view comparing her fate as that of "the woman hero who said NO"-(emance) - to say "no" was a main idea for "Achilles" in Homer's Ilias...)

nevertheless we have nothing more than the name of Vashti and this "No - I don't" (could have been shy and weak - the "feudalistic-potentates" were quick with consequences (until today) - and "happy new queen" Hadassa-Esther of this book still has to fear this husband, because he had the power to kill with or without reason (imagine: it were deadly dangerous to go to her husband and see him, for any question, only he had to call for her). We even don't really know who king "Ahashwerosh" should have been, there always could have been such husbands, kings or not. - ok, in the Purim-megillah is no description of a "civilisation" - you understand?

Each romances-author is free to undertake historical researches on that time in Persian regions - the poetry is totally free to imagine a living being - even a "Bambi" - and its life, in past or future times, and even fantasy-books may have an political side-effect - surely this one tries to have such, and why not?

in those ancient times I know of an "Kurdish"-problem with the peoples of the high mounts and the Assyrian king Sargon II, much earlier (they liked to say "no" - the "everlasting problem" between highlanders existing under very hard conditions are "free" as long as unvisible for the river-peoples, no time for writing poetical chronicles)

but this "Airyanem civilization" - there is no need to compare with any other culture, it is even worse to do this.

A good tale to make folks imageable "living-ups" may take some living people from such mountains from today - it may take a look at the possibilities of their modern "Vashtis" - what their grandmothers can tell about such situations even some decades back and while still in their homelands - look in their faces (not at a green grass nice flower) - there is a specific face of calm freedom - I saw it, and women had always their community in such worlds and other regions - the men had their own, too - with own rules to be free without saying "no".

And imagine: the "harem" for the women (Vashti came out, Hadassa-Esther went in) is an own system of power and sub-ordination - that of the ancient & modern oriental kings was huge, some hundreds of women and children mainly in their intern hierarchic order. TRADITION in capital letters... much much elder than any of our civilisations, sometimes more rude (I imagine the Chinese times of about 1900).

As for a book on this topic, the readers will decide. That's correct. - To write such tale is nevertheless a win-win-situation for the author.

Edited by: Dr.Wippich on Dec 14, 2012 7:33 AM